Researchers studying Canadian cities have documented stark inequities in access to cycling infrastructure. Neighbourhoods populated by higher concentrations of children, older adults, and racialized communities sit further from bike lanes, trails, and other cycling facilities compared to affluent, predominantly white areas.
The study reveals a pattern where cycling infrastructure investment follows wealth rather than need. Low-income neighbourhoods that could benefit most from affordable transportation options face the longest distances to usable cycling networks. This gap matters because cycling provides a cost-effective commute option, reduces car dependency, and improves public health outcomes.
Children in underserved areas lack safe routes to schools and recreational spaces on bikes. Older adults in these neighbourhoods cannot access the health benefits of cycling or use it as independent transportation. The research suggests that planning decisions systematically prioritized wealthier districts when allocating cycling resources.
The findings come as Canadian cities expand their cycling networks to meet climate goals and reduce congestion. However, without intentional equity measures, these investments will widen existing disparities. Communities furthest from bike infrastructure often have the least car access and highest transit reliance, making cycling a potential lifeline rather than a leisure choice.
The research underscores a broader planning challenge. Cities can build infrastructure, but without ensuring equitable distribution across neighbourhoods, cycling improvements benefit only those already privileged by geography and income. Addressing this requires mapping current disparities, prioritizing underserved areas in future projects, and consulting residents in marginalized communities about their actual cycling needs.